From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 15:28:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DEE106564A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:28:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.farley.org (mail.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:2::11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECBC8FC16 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thor.farley.org (HPooka@thor.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:1::5]) by mail.farley.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o92FSb1k007202; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:28:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:28:37 -0500 (CDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" To: "David O'Brien" In-Reply-To: <20101002060201.GA8287@dragon.NUXI.org> Message-ID: References: <4C93AA31.5080202@DataIX.net> <20100917205404.GA66620@atarininja.org> <20100917232437.GC67059@atarininja.org> <20101002060201.GA8287@dragon.NUXI.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.farley.org Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: editors/vim installs to / X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:28:39 -0000 On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 05:38:21PM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote: >> However, I still think it would benefit everyone if the maintainer >> could provide an explanation for some of the current behavior and >> would at least be open to discussion about changing it. The biggest >> problem here, IMHO, is not the OPTIONS issue, but rather the use of >> GTK 1 as the default. > > I have commented on GTK2 (explained) in the past. > It is the kitchen sink that gtk2 brings in vs. gtk1. On my desktop > gtk2 requires 64 other packages. gtk1 requires 20. > > I guess its time to take another survey. Is Vim one of the few last > gtk1 consumers? It probably is. Nothing I have installed uses GTK1. Actually, this includes Vim since I have it using Athena widgets. :) BTW, I just noticed by chance that Vim compiled with Athena widgets for the GUI has no dependency on libXaw. This is all the dependencies on my Vim install with a working gvim: Dependency: python26-2.6.6 Dependency: cscope-15.7a Dependency: libiconv-1.13.1_1 Sean -- scf@FreeBSD.org