From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 15:53:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E466647 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0136.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.110.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EC048A9 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (73.5.142.244) by BY1PR0301MB0840.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.193.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.59.20; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:52:56 +0000 Message-ID: <54BA8552.8070102@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:52:50 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [73.5.142.244] X-ClientProxiedBy: BLUPR06CA0005.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.255.219.143) To BY1PR0301MB0840.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.193.146) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=aberg010@my.HennepinTech.edu; X-DmarcAction-Test: None X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005004);SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0840; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004); SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0840; X-Forefront-PRVS: 04599F3534 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6049001)(6009001)(189002)(51704005)(199003)(24454002)(47776003)(122386002)(107886001)(40100003)(2351001)(558084003)(106356001)(42186005)(83506001)(75432002)(105586002)(92566002)(62966003)(23676002)(87976001)(97736003)(54356999)(65816999)(450100001)(50986999)(2950100001)(77156002)(86362001)(64706001)(101416001)(33656002)(50466002)(65806001)(76176999)(110136001)(89122001)(46102003)(65956001)(80316001)(87266999)(64126003)(66066001)(68736005)(77096005)(88552001)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0840; H:[10.0.0.21]; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: my.HennepinTech.edu does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0840; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2015 15:52:56.8696 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0301MB0840 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:53:06 -0000 On 2015.01.17 09:24, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part of BASE ? > > Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has. > > I for one, would very much like it. What advantage does it have over svnlite(1)?