From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 10 09:49:53 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E4DEED8;
 Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from f10.opsec.eu (f10.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBDFE2F98;
 Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:49:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by f10.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <pi@FreeBSD.org>)
 id 1WuIgf-000ADV-A5; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:49:49 +0200
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:49:49 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org>
To: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: www/p5-libapreq2: libtool fix, strip libs, pkg-plist followup,
 p5-fix
Message-ID: <20140610094949.GY3484@f10.opsec.eu>
References: <20140608081334.GK1427@f10.opsec.eu>
 <20140608083407.GL1427@f10.opsec.eu>
 <20140608083636.GM1427@f10.opsec.eu>
 <20140608085842.GO1427@f10.opsec.eu> <53945E98.3080408@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53945E98.3080408@gmx.de>
Cc: Frederic Culot <culot@FreeBSD.org>, skv@FreeBSD.org, apache@freebsd.org,
 Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Support of apache-related ports  <freebsd-apache.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-apache>,
 <mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-apache/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-apache@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-apache>,
 <mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:49:53 -0000

Hi!

Back to my proposed change for www/libapreq2 and this question:

> > Would it be more useful to make the slave port (p5-libapreq2)
> > a seperate port depending on the other ?

Looking at the pkg-plist and Makefile mess: Is it really useful
to have this master/slave port or should I split and depend on libapreq2 ?

-- 
pi@FreeBSD.org         +49 171 3101372                          6 years to go !