From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 12 22:16:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC659106564A for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581488FC16 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o8CMDikN052663; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:13:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:13:50 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20100912.161350.93202495727462070.imp@bsdimp.com> To: 000.fbsd@quip.cz From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <4C8D234F.40204@quip.cz> References: <4C8D234F.40204@quip.cz> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs OpenSolaris vs Nexenta ZFS Benchmarks X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:16:09 -0000 In message: <4C8D234F.40204@quip.cz> Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> writes: : I am sending this link to those interested in poor performance results : of FreeNAS (FreeBSD) and ZFS. : : http://www.zfsbuild.com/2010/09/10/freenas-vs-opensolaris-zfs-benchmarks/ Thanks. They are testing an old version of ZFS (the one in FreeBSD 7) against the latest version (the one in OpenSolaris). I'm guessing that's the main source of the difference. Warner