From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 16:53:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D19106566C for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com) Received: from mail.intertainservices.com (mail.intertainservices.com [38.99.187.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5058FC14 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.10.199] (unknown [172.16.10.199]) by mail.intertainservices.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6645C56491 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:36:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B991C00.3010809@intertainservices.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:36:16 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <4B99031D.3080308@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4B99031D.3080308@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-intertainservices-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-intertainservices-MailScanner-ID: 6645C56491.AE88A X-intertainservices-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-intertainservices-MailScanner-From: mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: HEADS UP: COMPAT_IA32 renamed COMPAT_FREEBSD32 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:53:43 -0000 On 3/11/2010 9:50 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > As a result of importing 32-bit compatibility support for non-x86 > 64-bit platforms, the kernel options COMPAT_IA32 has been renamed > COMPAT_FREEBSD32 in revision 205014, so all kernel configurations > including this option must be modified accordingly. > That sounds a bit confusing, compatibility with FreeBSD 3.2?