From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon May 10 13:58:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238DD6382F9 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 13:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ff2hv0Vwvz3Pvp for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 13:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from hps2020.home.selasky.org (unknown [178.17.145.105]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E18D22600DD; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:58:51 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Patch for patch, but not foreach :-) To: Chris , Michael Gmelin Cc: FreeBSD Current , Shawn Webb References: <12082107-B6CE-4EB3-935A-812FC1966CFA@grem.de> <36f77d67cb2673caf8ce72ec45ce8881@bsdforge.com> From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <1cbe6ac6-c48b-a59e-dc3d-18cf59ed16aa@selasky.org> Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 15:57:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <36f77d67cb2673caf8ce72ec45ce8881@bsdforge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Ff2hv0Vwvz3Pvp X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hps@selasky.org designates 2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hps@selasky.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.11 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mail.turbocat.net:c]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[selasky.org]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2:from]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.983]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.82)[-0.822]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 13:58:56 -0000 On 5/7/21 11:58 PM, Chris wrote: > On 2021-05-07 14:10, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> What about using "."? Or "/" (which would match the muscle memory of >> "search" in >> less/more/vi/some browsers)? > +1 > I really like that idea. Hi, Thank you for all the good feedback! Based on the input I've got, the differential revision has now been updated: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30160 --HPS