From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 28 17:43:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319DC10656AA for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9A98FC14 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18DB322C50C1; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:27:53 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:27:52 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Tobias Roth Message-ID: <20100328202752.0a991679@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <4BAF7C32.8020905@fsck.ch> References: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <4BAF7C32.8020905@fsck.ch> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/8JF1pfum5BFDjIVov.WkTym"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:43:18 -0000 --Sig_/8JF1pfum5BFDjIVov.WkTym Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:56:34 +0200 Tobias Roth wrote: > On 3/28/10 3:38 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > >=20 > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands > > ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA > > is 6-7 April.=20 > >=20 > > The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared > > lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > >=20 > > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all > > done, and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help > > testing / fixing. >=20 >=20 > What does that mean, the first one was done? The port was updated > before this warning? >=20 > I have updated png this morning, will I now be negatively affected? PNG update was committed this morning at 06:47:48 UTC. If you have updated png (not just csup your ports tree) then you'll probably have to update the rest of your ports, since they won't find the old png shared lib. (you could try to map the new lib to the old one, it might or not work) --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/8JF1pfum5BFDjIVov.WkTym Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkuvkZgACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeV3rACfVhPHcRBjm1MhawijJd0CGue9 FxwAn1xyhj5GJSkVC7he3dXtTkKL13y/ =F0tT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8JF1pfum5BFDjIVov.WkTym--