From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 7 07:48:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB8D16A40F for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 07:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AB943D4C for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 07:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m18so86620nfc for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:48:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=S3gX9KurcwIUSFf96mqnc2qLt44Tk7bONjNAGOxR3k4KVdbTtXFkvBDvT/NxocYbh87rlkcQYaTLyEfiSHKXfKaJGCxIDEuOkB44JNf6JIAQwDl7hThkSU9ek3E/TBwYr4DTSNfpg86qiT+bQAeDFi0aQoohjV9DyKjL5tiYufA= Received: by 10.48.142.8 with SMTP id p8mr231968nfd.1162885685073; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:48:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.203.16 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 23:48:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 23:48:04 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: "FreeBSD questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Cacti -vs- mrtg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 07:48:15 -0000 I can use MRTG, and have MRTG do what I want it to do. Id like to try cacti, but..am I alone in finding that it's a PITA? Im not trying to be negative, just looking for a reality check. I like the simplicity of mrtg, but I like the "go back in time" of cacti to view performance data. If its just a matter of a package that's not ready for Joe Public (thats me)..Id accept that. :)