Date: 12 Jul 2000 12:53:23 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> Cc: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net>, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fetch(1) timeout Message-ID: <xzpem4z62n0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Wed, 12 Jul 2000 06:44:05 -0400" References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007120534530.427-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> <xzpvgyb65g1.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20000712055707.C1690@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <xzpn1jn64r2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20000712061459.D1690@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <xzpitub63in.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20000712064405.E1690@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> writes: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 12:34:24PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > It is possible to modify fetch(1) so it will set the modification time > > even if interrupted; I will consider doing so if the changes required > > are not too intrusive. > Seems that would be a simple signal() setup. I'll look into the code > and send you a diff (hopefully soon). No need, I've got it licked (and improved the timeout handling while I was at it). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpem4z62n0.fsf>