From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 23 18:16:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA28489 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 23 May 1997 18:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA28484 for ; Fri, 23 May 1997 18:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) id KAA03569; Sat, 24 May 1997 10:46:40 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199705240116.KAA03569@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: Named -- Specifying addresses to bind to. In-Reply-To: <19970523152900.36766@pavilion.net> from Josef Karthauser at "May 23, 97 03:29:00 pm" To: joe@pavilion.net (Josef Karthauser) Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 10:46:39 +0930 (CST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Josef Karthauser stands accused of saying: > BTW. Why do I still need libc.so.2.2 on my fbsd2.2.2 machine when > it has compiled libc.so.3.0? I've done reboot and another make world > to try and get it to link against the newer library, but It doesn't > want to play :(. I'd like a nice tidy system ;) Probably because you have ports linked against it. LibraryReport (/usr/src/tools/lreport/LibraryReport) will scan your system and give you a summary of shared library usage and dependancies which may shed some light on your situation. > Joe -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[