From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 26 16:27:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4325F16A403; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1D143D55; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:27:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A090F46D88; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:27:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:27:07 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20061026143306.GB790@rambler-co.ru> Message-ID: <20061026172516.E29443@fledge.watson.org> References: <200610261255.k9QCtXje082459@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061026143306.GB790@rambler-co.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm uma_core.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:27:08 -0000 On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:55:32PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: >> rwatson 2006-10-26 12:55:32 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> sys/vm uma_core.c >> Log: >> Better align output of "show uma" by moving from displaying the basic >> counters of allocs/frees/use for each zone to the same statistics >> shown by userspace "vmstat -z". > > "The same statistics" also shows LIMIT, REQUESTS, and FAILURES. Requests are included in the output I added, but are spelt "Requests". Limits and failures currently aren't, but adding them wouldn't be a bad idea at all. I'm also thinking off adding a "show umazone " which would provide more detailed information about per-CPU caches, as we're currently looking at a potential UMA bug in a panic report on -stable. We'd pull some, but not all, of the logic from umastat.c. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge