From owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Sat May 7 07:58:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00170B31538; Sat, 7 May 2016 07:58:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B318110D3; Sat, 7 May 2016 07:58:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x230.google.com with SMTP id r5so56464119pag.1; Sat, 07 May 2016 00:58:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wy+Jt8EneHSB7gHRdjnIAGpEuyUk2cFU9IBhjSssJPY=; b=vIpQmiwHnrU97qEfmbxTaeg8zcRvpjU6h7jwVUXYPj2HaYJxkxwGD9B66PL6vCv9Yj t0V908jx8zzXLwPrFICScVgpie9HdDVrbNFHWhta1iK7BdQZzn7AL51gLeHEBZOAbDeV 669IJ05IDWHIu//rN/h4Qewe7t+0wEcLrrOm8GT2PJCbl8dPqEHzxNBnw1i6gudkIzsL ILySq4A+D7SAXL1dmKz45xYwG0jmSimBHoIWMkmsJh/2DNRh2M207r5h6SQRkTbYLscD 9q3r0wb+82lilmY8fG4xnazH+8QISu8YDDbiNyoqmW0l/UckiKTPnaoip/oGGhgdZa7w 2i+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wy+Jt8EneHSB7gHRdjnIAGpEuyUk2cFU9IBhjSssJPY=; b=KCRenv2HBte1W8CPzqICrjfV8q7vD6B2chbGpiMJ7o2uPhms3bE87IP42aokWy0ClP g+yKVMHmn2O8lYG+viXAVtUJn/Gm4lCR4axKc1uIT70qhlDWT0+wZAac6H9xe+lZq6C4 nmvnVv00toj2UYHf89VdHYic/+0IpZJdzGTzSNJBG3mGlhIcStkhZDfjZ1/1Fns4iWEr ECOe4hYWKel9S/eKhMvP/L1GAZveLmZwMMXw4p5+NTKMG0Sxx1tiFyO+CHIGHhzp+trj 8crcAEUjPqWQC2gPVLMM6nBSzQsxSc+NH5ZK4C78AW5LDnx8lGuGKkbaw+ANX5nSd3XN ssGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX3nGlZptDUVpIuRQ9fS626tui3OQNNtN1iNt21PWz87JD4yCLJvDf8jwMQnu1xCw== X-Received: by 10.66.173.141 with SMTP id bk13mr34516593pac.64.1462607898265; Sat, 07 May 2016 00:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.7] (c-73-97-222-46.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [73.97.222.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w187sm26014369pfw.50.2016.05.07.00.58.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 May 2016 00:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS and PkgBase From: "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 00:58:14 -0700 Cc: Glen Barber , "freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Current Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20160506221151.GN1362@FreeBSD.org> <7018EDCD-A567-446D-965C-9E886D543238@gmail.com> <20160507074159.GC47527@FreeBSD.org> To: Ben Woods X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Packaging the FreeBSD base system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 07:58:19 -0000 > On May 7, 2016, at 00:46, Ben Woods wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 7 May 2016 at 09:41, Glen Barber wrote: > I think this raises a larger question - did "something" change that > otherwise violates POLA? The commit recently was intended to revert > a POLA violation, so maybe I am not entirely clear on what branch this > affects. >=20 > Are we talking about head or stable/10 here? >=20 > Glen >=20 > I am talking about head, which no longer installs/packages multiple = kernels by default. > = https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/Makefile.inc1?revision=3D299088&view=3D= markup >=20 > Whilst the r299088 commit is referring to a stable POLA violation, the = commit itself is a change to head with a proposed MFC after 3 days. Its = interesting, because this has surprised me when testing PkgBase on head, = as the behaviour has changed from the initial announcement. The behavior in and of itself (to me) is unintuitive. I use a different = wrapper script [*] to install kernels with a different name because I = want them to be versioned based on $KERNCONF + revision data. I only = fixed building multiple kernels because the change that glebius tested = didn=E2=80=99t work with more than one KERNCONF (hence the double = commit). I think the default behavior should be =E2=80=9Cyes=E2=80=9D (not = =E2=80=9Cno=E2=80=9D) as many folks use a single KERNCONF, not multiple = (on head), but I=E2=80=99m biased in this thinking... Thanks! -Ngie * = https://github.com/yaneurabeya/scratch/blob/master/bayonetta/root/bin/inst= allkernel.sh=