From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 17 6:40:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from diarmadhi.mushhaven.net (diarmadhi.mushhaven.net [209.16.107.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE4937B423 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 06:40:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mistwolf@diarmadhi.mushhaven.net) Received: (from mistwolf@localhost) by diarmadhi.mushhaven.net (8.11.3/8.11.0) id f4HDeUB95598 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 17 May 2001 09:40:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mistwolf) Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:31:27 -0400 From: Jamie Norwood To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Subject: Re: Administrative tag a possibility? Message-ID: <20010517093127.A95460@mushhaven.net> References: <00df01c0dec9$ef270b00$0b01000a@apollo> <3B03C76F.4403BC31@math.missouri.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B03C76F.4403BC31@math.missouri.edu>; from stephen@math.missouri.edu on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:43:27AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:43:27AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > That seems a little dangerous - perhaps some of the files will have > md5 appearing in other lines for other reasons, and that would mess > up this simple grep. Perhaps a more complicated tag in the file would > be more appropriate. Not to mention that, AFAIK, once you add the checksum to the file, the checksum would be different because the file is no longer the same, ne? I am not aware of a way to include a checksum in the file being checked. Jamie > -- > Stephen Montgomery-Smith > stephen@math.missouri.edu > http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message