From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Oct 20 2: 0: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6D637B4CF for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 02:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id CAA78097; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 02:00:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 02:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010200900.CAA78097@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Roman Shterenzon Subject: Re: kern/22103: 4.1-R with Adaptec and Vinum crashes on periodic daily Reply-To: Roman Shterenzon Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/22103; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Roman Shterenzon To: Andy Newman Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/22103: 4.1-R with Adaptec and Vinum crashes on periodic daily Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:56:42 +0200 (IST) On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Andy Newman wrote: > You don't say how vinum if configured. RAID 5 by any chance? It looks > exactly like something I ran into a while back with a 29160 based > system. > In my casual glancing at the various "control blocks" being used it > looked > like outstanding requests complete after the parent data structure is > freed > (at least the pointers are NULL). This was all a little while ago and > the > details are a little sketchy. Only RAID 5 exhibited the problem. I'm > running the array as RAID 0 with no problems. Yes, it's running RAID-5. But, glance at kdb session advises that could be a SCSI related problem, rather than vinum one. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message