From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 20 08:31:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D12737B401 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 08:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9169143FE0 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 08:31:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h3KFVMua015181; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 11:31:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 11:31:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Manfred Antar In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20030420080745.00a80490@pozo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: UFS2 now the default creation type on 5.0-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:31:06 -0000 On Sun, 20 Apr 2003, Manfred Antar wrote: > At 11:02 AM 4/20/2003 -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > >As of today, newfs(8) and sysinstall(8) will create UFS2 file systems by > >default, unless explicitly specified. Users wanting to create UFS1 file > >systems for whatever reason (interoperability with earlier versions, etc) > >should be sure to employ the -O1 flag to newfs(8), or hit '1' in the label > >editor in sysinstall(8) to select UFS1. > > Does the /boot/loader now understand UFS2 on the root filesystem (i386) > I've get /var and /usr on UFS2 file systems. But a few months ago the > bootblocks were not working for i386 Yes. Or at least, it does on my notebook and three or four servers. There were initially some size glitches because UFS2 required additional 64-bit operations in the boot record, and that exceeded the space at the front of the file system, but I believe that has now been resolved. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories