From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 15 13:26:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC9437B6A0 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 13:26:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@holly.calldei.com) Received: from holly.calldei.com ([208.191.155.7]) by mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id <0FUM00FQLBG31M@mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net> for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 15 May 2000 15:26:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.calldei.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA39954; Mon, 15 May 2000 15:26:11 -0500 (CDT envelope-from chris) Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 15:26:10 -0500 From: Chris Costello Subject: Re: utmpx, this is gonna hurt... In-reply-to: <200005151955.PAA03468@rac1.wam.umd.edu> To: James Howard Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chris@calldei.com Message-id: <20000515152610.D35004@holly.calldei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.4i References: <200005151955.PAA03468@rac1.wam.umd.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday, May 15, 2000, James Howard wrote: > How about adding the utmpx as required by SUSV2? It would make writing > programs that need to talk to utmp/utmpx a lot simpler. Yes? No? I agree that this would be a good idea. -- |Chris Costello |Performance proven: It works through beta test. `----------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message