From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 16 09:51:12 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121B416A400
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:51:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de)
Received: from smtp-1.dlr.de (smtp-1.dlr.de [195.37.61.185])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E6113C458
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:51:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de)
Received: from knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.173.6]) by smtp-1.dlr.de
	over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:51:09 +0100
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:51:06 +0100 (CET)
From: Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de>
X-X-Sender: brandt_h@knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20070316104749.J88087@knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
X-OpenPGP-Key: harti@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-ID: <20070316104754.K88087@knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2007 09:51:09.0812 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[9FE94B40:01C767B0]
Subject: LOCAL_CREDS socket option
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:51:12 -0000


Hi,

is there any specific reason that we don't support the LOCAL_CREDS option 
for SOCK_DGRAM sockets in the local domain? It's documented in unix(4) for 
a long time and it looks like it is supported, for example, in NetBSD.

harti