From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 20:55:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C814106564A; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 20:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from doug-optiplex.ka9q.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B1414E110; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 20:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4D70002C.2090308@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:55:08 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110301 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <4D6BB5E3.6020408@freebsd.org> <201102281020.12599.jhb@freebsd.org> <4D6E641A.4060109@freebsd.org> <20110303091903.GA79958@psconsult.nl> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Paul Schenkeveld , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for review/testing: switching the default installer X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:55:16 -0000 On 03/03/2011 02:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > While working on this maybe it would be interesting to now use makefs > instead of mkisofs, making installer generation 100% self hosting. > > makefs has recently been updating to a recent version from netbsd and > now support iso9660, I already managed to create bootable livecd with > it. That would be very nice. There is a weird situation now where you can't do ISO creation within 'make release' without also building ports, which is a lot of overhead. I "solved" this problem by scripting the ISO creation as a separate step, but it felt kludgy to me. Another nice improvement in this space would be to be able to select the specific ISO(s) that you want to create. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/