Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Jul 2012 20:14:51 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Does FreeBSD start slices at head boundaries?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207062014330.13267@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <4FF724AF.9090602@ose.nl>
References:  <CAHzLAVE0CahZhkKzU5=bLy5AvKsq_qgmqwAiO9BhWD3k1_uFvQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207061842370.5024@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FF71637.9030206@d3photography.com> <20471.8240.321332.987229@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4FF724AF.9090602@ose.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I think Ryan means partition and not slice?
> I would not recommend no slices at all, It's deprecated to use "dangerously 
> dedicated disks"
>
> Starting with 9 I don't see slices in mount ouput anymore but still there are 
> FreeBSD partitions in slices (which is a partitions in dos terms)
> Example / is now disk0p1 it used to be disk0s1a

you use GUID partition table.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1207062014330.13267>