From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 10:39:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418C616A419 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:39:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0052413C478 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:39:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A41209C; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:23:21 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.2/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799D52049; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:23:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 550DF844AF; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:23:20 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Chuck Robey References: <200801101717.m0AHHHmF068362@fire.js.berklix.net> <4786C660.40103@chuckr.org> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:23:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4786C660.40103@chuckr.org> (Chuck Robey's message of "Thu\, 10 Jan 2008 20\:29\:04 -0500") Message-ID: <86ejcofyp3.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Julian Stacey , "Aryeh M. Friedman" , chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why the FreeBSD license will not be changing X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:39:53 -0000 Chuck Robey writes: > what wee need is a rule, that if you demand folks should move the thread = to > such-and-such a list, that YOU ACTUALLY DO THAT. I will admit, Julian, y= ou > came closest, you at least posted to -chat, would have been pretty good, = if > only you'd removed -current before you sent it. Why do folks always insi= st > on the other fellow do what you won't do? SOP is to Bcc: the old list and mention the move at the top of your email. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no