From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 3 21:55:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA23496 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 21:55:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA23491 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 21:55:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA00689; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 21:56:53 -0800 (PST) To: "Allen Smith" cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh , Andreas Klemm , Eivind Eklund , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 03 Dec 1998 23:54:46 EST." <9812032354.ZM6453@beatrice.rutgers.edu> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1998 21:56:52 -0800 Message-ID: <685.912751012@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I believe IPsec just ran into a larger problem... parts excerpted for > fair use. The Wassenaar countries include the home countries of all > the IPsec participants, so far as I know. I think it's too early to say. Let's just get the technology in place and worry about the export issues, whatever form they may have that month, later. If we do it the other way around, we'll never get to the point where we have any technology worth exporting in any case and the entire point will be somewhat moot. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message