From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  9 19:19:08 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1447716A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Apr 2004 19:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net
	[207.172.4.62])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E959743D48
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Apr 2004 19:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com)
Received: from 209-6-197-67.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com
	([209.6.197.67] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org)
	by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
	id 1BC85L-0000Lo-00
	for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 22:19:07 -0400
From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16503.22938.641975.828626@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 22:19:06 -0400
To: ports@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20040410011011.GE6183@isis.wad.cz>
References: <16503.20327.201636.930655@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
	<20040410011011.GE6183@isis.wad.cz>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5  (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid
Subject: Re: overlapping ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 02:19:08 -0000


Roman Neuhauser writes:

>  > 	Is the correct thing to do here to point mozilla at smabe
>  > (which may create unnecessary work when either package is upgraded)
>  > or is there a way to fool or bypass samba-libsmbclient?
>  
>      make install -DDISABLE_CONFLICTS

	Suceeded.
	Thank you.


			Robert Huff