From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 24 20:26:00 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE56D16A41C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:26:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
	[69.194.102.232])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4845043D54
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:26:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 9F5DE513C0; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:26:47 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de>
Message-ID: <20050524202647.GA28322@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <3248.172.16.0.199.1116876092.squirrel@172.16.0.1>
	<20050523211307.GA36552@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<42924949.1070902@incubus.de>
	<200505242141.38289.max@love2party.net>
	<42938C2E.6020301@incubus.de>
	<20050524201942.GA28257@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<42938D40.1050502@incubus.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <42938D40.1050502@incubus.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, Max Laier <max@love2party.net>,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:26:00 -0000


--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:23:28PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>=20
> > But are any IRQs shared?
>=20
> Hmm... atapci1 is shared with fxp0 on irq 20.. does fxp0 also require
> the giant lock?

I don't think so..but the shared interrupt might still be causing some
other problem.  Try compiling a kernel without fxp support and see if
you still have the interactive problems under disk load.

Kris

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCk44HWry0BWjoQKURAkbvAJ9dmY1EK5p0eJq5y8CVQK5GvTYJ5gCgjuPT
7lnupUeQqC4JDOecj/1B/Ps=
=tZun
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--