From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu May 27 12:29:18 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DD014E60
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 27 May 1999 12:29:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu)
Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost)
          by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA01902;
          Thu, 27 May 1999 12:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu)
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 12:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To: Hristo Grigorov <hristo@bg.freebsd.org>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: upgrade
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905260949040.4426-100000@nic.bse.bg>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.03.9905271227120.16577-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, 26 May 1999, Hristo Grigorov wrote:

> Greetings,
> 
> what's recommended for system upgrade:
> 
> 2.2.8 -> 3.1 -> 3.2
> 
> or
> 
> 2.2.8 -> 3.2

If you plan on doing a binary upgrade, it doesn't matter either way.

If you're doing a source upgrade, going to 3.1 is guaranteed to work, then
build 3.2.

Doug White                               
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | www.freebsd.org



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message