From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 26 17:30:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5A016A41C for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 17:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BF043D49 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 17:30:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4QHU6wP024609 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 17:30:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4QHU6bC024608; Thu, 26 May 2005 17:30:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 17:30:06 GMT Message-Id: <200505261730.j4QHU6bC024608@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Andriy Gapon Cc: Subject: Re: kern/81496: acd (atapicd) device lacks devstat X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andriy Gapon List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 17:30:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/81496; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andriy Gapon To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/81496: acd (atapicd) device lacks devstat Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 20:20:22 +0300 on 26.05.2005 19:09 Poul-Henning Kamp said the following: > In message <4295F115.4050301@icyb.net.ua>, Andriy Gapon writes: >>on 26.05.2005 18:31 Poul-Henning Kamp said the following: >>>In message <200505261152.j4QBqFEV082234@www.freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon writes: >>I am not sure why acd0 got all zeros. > > Because you use atapi-cam and /dev/cd0 ? you are correct, it was my bad - I mounted cd0 instead of acd0. Now everything is reported correcly. Thank you very much for introducing gstat to me. >>Anyway, even if gstat should work perfectly for acd, I think it is no >>reason to have iostat/systat incomplete. Also, a reference to gstat(8) >>in iostat(8) and systat(1) would be nice too. > > Yeah, I think it is point 1032 on my todo list :-( I hope you were talking just about man pages, not iostat/systat utilities themselves. -- Andriy Gapon