From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun  1 06:26:02 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A13037B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  1 Jun 2003 06:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au (smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au
	[210.50.76.52])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB9743FF7
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  1 Jun 2003 06:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au)
Received: from dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au (210.50.206.51) by
	smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.015)
	id 3ECBEA34001AADBF; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 23:26:00 +1000
Received: by dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 237F7C90F; Sun,  1 Jun 2003 23:24:27 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 23:24:27 +1000
From: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
Message-ID: <20030601232426.A43338@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
References: <3ED9E8AB.5060106@he.iki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <3ED9E8AB.5060106@he.iki.fi>;
	from pete@he.iki.fi on Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 02:51:07PM +0300
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: raidframe
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 13:26:02 -0000

On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 02:51:07PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:

> Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
> of hardware?

RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be
unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation. Hopefully it
will be fixed before 5.2.


Tim