From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 16:09:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66784C25F78 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:09:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.kissl.de [213.239.241.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ED79FC0; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-217-062-255.092.217.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.217.62.255]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D064283ACE; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:09:03 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Subject: Re: www/subsonic-standalone license From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:09:01 +0200 Cc: jlh@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports , Michael Zhilin Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <943D0C76-1890-415C-BE61-4083E97F8635@lastsummer.de> References: <25221A70-7B8F-4D10-AEEB-054FA7D58B0D@lastsummer.de> To: Joshua Ruehlig X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:09:07 -0000 > On 28 Oct 2016, at 5:53 PM, Joshua Ruehlig = wrote: >=20 > Franco, what do you mean a maintainer drop? > Also Madsonic, which is supposedly GPL based on their website is = available. The maintainer resigned, but updated to 6.0 because there were no = distfiles, and the code seemed to be gone for 5.3 is now on GitHub: https://github.com/sindremehus/subsonic I don't know whether 6.0 is quintessential, but from a pure license = perspective it seems odd that everyone now has to use a proprietary license with no = options given even though we still have the original 5.3 *and* a fork which = could very well gain traction of a port was added as an alternative. Just for the record, I know this takes work. Not asking for it to be = done, simply wondering why this happened the way it did. Cheers, Franco=