Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 23:06:06 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu Cc: wb2oyc@cyberenet.net, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD or Linux Message-ID: <199610090406.XAA05320@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.94.961008201726.2709E-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu> from "Doug White" at Oct 8, 96 08:21:50 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, 8 Oct 1996 wb2oyc@cyberenet.net wrote: > > > >From a long time user of Linux (favorite distribution is > > Debian), and a newbie to FreeBSD, I'd have to say at this > > point that I prefer Linux. That is without consideration > > for ANY differences in the architecture or internals, and > > purely from a user perspective. The things I'm having > > problems with under FreeBSD (minicom, ppp, console behavior, > > memory utilization, fvwm95, etc, etc) all work flawlessly > > under Debian Linux. > > Because minicom and fvwm95 were written for linux and were ported/hacked > to FreeBSD. > I am really confused about the fvwm95 problem though. It works great for me and is now the only window manager that I use. There seems to be user error involved somewhere :-). I even use the fvwm95 distribution, and not our ports. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610090406.XAA05320>