From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Mar 26 14:48:26 1997
Return-Path: <owner-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA06506
          for stable-outgoing; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:48:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shrimp.dataplex.net (shrimp.dataplex.net [208.2.87.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA06464;
          Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:48:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [204.69.236.50] (GATEWAY.SKIPSTONE.COM [198.214.10.129])
	by shrimp.dataplex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA03662;
	Wed, 26 Mar 1997 16:47:56 -0600 (CST)
Date: 26 Mar 97 16:50:03 -0600
Subject: Re: FreeBSD-SA-97:02: Buffer overflow in lpd
From: "Richard Wackerbarth" <rkw@dataplex.net>
To: "FreeBSD Security Officer" <security-officer@freebsd.org>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Cyberdog/2.0b1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <AF5F0440-5CDD7@204.69.236.50>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 26, 1997 3:37 PM, FreeBSD Security Officer
<mailto:security-officer@freebsd.org> wrote: 
>FreeBSD-SA-97:02                                            Security
Advisory
...

>Affects:        FreeBSD 2.1.7 and earlier and FreeBSD 2.2 snapshots
>		before 1997/02/25 suffer from this problem.
>Corrected:      FreeBSD-current as of 1997/02/25
>		FreeBSD 2.2 as of 1997/02/25

May I ask why you failed to include this correction in our 2.1
distribution?
That is still the "stable" branch and SHOULD receive this kind of support
at least until 2.2 gains some maturity in the real world.