From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 30 12:36:05 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A87F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:36:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from relay03.pair.com (relay03.pair.com [209.68.5.17])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C760143D2D
	for <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:36:04 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from dwalton@acm.org)
Received: (qmail 9517 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2005 12:36:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.1.34?) (unknown)
  by unknown with SMTP; 30 Jan 2005 12:36:01 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 68.125.128.172
Message-ID: <41FCD47C.70002@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 04:35:08 -0800
From: Dave Walton <dwalton@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041208)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>
References: <20050130025808.9EFB45D07@ptavv.es.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050130025808.9EFB45D07@ptavv.es.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Trouble with APM suspend in 5.3-R
X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dwalton@acm.org
List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD <freebsd-mobile.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:36:05 -0000

Kevin Oberman wrote:
> 
> This is an odd one. One of the changes in 1.233 was MFC'ed in 1.222.2.5,
> but the second part, describes as:
> Cosmetic change to suspend, dont call tsleep an extra time at exit.
> has never been MFCed for some reason. I'm copying Søren in hoes that he
> will MFC the remainder of 1.233.
> 
> It does allow my system to suspend just fine, but it now locks up with
> the disk active on resume :-(
> 
> I'll have to try the patch Gleb posted to see if it fixes this one!

Let me know how it goes, since we seem to be facing the same problem. 
In my case, with Gleb's patch it still locks up, but without the disk 
active.

Dave