From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 17 10:19:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA03277 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 17 May 1996 10:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA03272 for ; Fri, 17 May 1996 10:19:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA27702; Fri, 17 May 1996 11:19:08 -0600 Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 11:19:08 -0600 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199605171719.LAA27702@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: mycroft@mit.edu (Charles M. Hannum) Cc: Nate Williams , "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" , Peter Mutsaers , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: internal compiler error In-Reply-To: References: <87loisb709.fsf@plm.simplex.nl> <199605170751.AAA16653@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> <199605171435.IAA27102@rocky.sri.MT.net> Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > ago. GCC 1.4.5 was used by NetBSD looong after GCC 2 was released. > > He's actually referring to GCC 2.4.5. Thus most of your comments > aren't relevant. Neither are his. :) > > The *biggest* reason was the shlibs worked in GCC 2 and not in GCC 1. > > Now, the above reasons may be why they switched from Gcc 2.5.3 -> 2.7.2, > > since the GCC in NetBSD was 2.5.3 until recently. > > We have never distributed GCC 2.5.x. Ahh, so it was GCC 2.4.5. I never realized you were *that* far behind the times. :(