From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 14:43:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A0716A4CE; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:43:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8211843D2D; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:43:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AE03D42; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:43:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Langille" To: Gavin Atkinson Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:43:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <425A54C5.27340.1795BAFF@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <1113227367.35703.12.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> References: <425A3579.2138.171B7898@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:43:19 -0000 On 11 Apr 2005 at 14:49, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 08:29 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2005 at 15:23, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:16 -0400 > > > "Dan Langille" wrote: > > > > > > > On 11 Apr 2005 at 8:04, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > > > > > > > > obrien 2005-04-11 08:04:41 UTC > > > > > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > > > FreshPorts tells me that these ports were broken by this commit: > > > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > > Next time I won't bother to make a list then :) > > > > > FreshPorts does a sanity check for each port in a commit. Any > > failures are emailed to the comitter if the comitter opts in. To opt > > in, register using your @FreeBSD.org email address at > > http://www.freshports.org/ > > > > Is there any value in making sanity test failures publicly available? > > I would actually like it to email the maintainer (possibly as well as > the committer) if the maintainer has registered with FreshPorts - is > that possible? The maintainer could be easily added. > If not, making the failures public would make sense. Breakages become public later anyways... when INDEX breaks. Sanity Tests are advance notice of that. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/ NEW brochure available at http://www.bsdcan.org/2005/advocacy/