From owner-freebsd-multimedia  Sun Mar 24 19:59:27 1996
Return-Path: owner-multimedia
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA16697
          for multimedia-outgoing; Sun, 24 Mar 1996 19:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA16692
          for <freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 1996 19:59:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA01465; Sun, 24 Mar 1996 19:58:26 -0800
Message-Id: <199603250358.TAA01465@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Kim Culhan <kimc@w8hd.org>
cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Vat on 2.1R? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 24 Mar 1996 22:20:48 EST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.960324221339.642E-100000@moonpie.w8hd.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 19:58:25 -0800
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-multimedia@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Actually, the driver with minor hacking could be made to work on 
2.1R --- just files.i386 needed to be changed to reference the files.
Vat.info on rah star-gate pointed this out.

-stable is what I am running over here.

-current Brian Litzinger ported the 3.5 sound driver to -current.

I don't have any problems in vat + gus pnp or gus max locally or 
on the mbone.

	Amancio

>>> Kim Culhan said:
 > 
 > 
 > On Sun, 24 Mar 1996, Amancio Hasty Jr. wrote:
 > 
 > > Well, vat with gus cards does work with 2.1R specially if you use 
 > > the 3.5 sound driver. 
 > 
 > It was my understanding at the time (4 wks ago) you needed to be running
 > at least -stable to use the 3.5 sound driver, I upgraded at that point.
 > 
 > > Aside from the SB crowd , I am not sure what people are having problems
 > > with.
 > > 
 > 
 > At some point I determined -current was the only way to go and made that
 > hurdle.
 > Now it seems vat runs fairly well talking to an sgi on the local network,
 > which we are fortunate to have available for testing. The SGI runs the binar
     y
 > frm LBL, if it can't talk to that then I don't know what can.
 > 
 > regards
 > kim
 > 
 > --
 > kimc@w8hd.org
 >