Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:08:47 -0800
From:      "Dan O'Connor" <dan@mostgraveconcern.com>
To:        "Duraid" <latif2221@home.com>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: NAT with ipfw?
Message-ID:  <008b01c0a062$38812200$029b140a@danco>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>if the default policy is to deny every thing then why you firewall is
>full with deny rulls. shouldn't it just have the allow rulls since
>everything else is going to be droped by default.

Mostly to log specific ports...Others (like FTP) so I can quickly make them
'allow' temporarily.


>other thing i think your firewall is stateless (using establish). if you
>have made it statefull (using keep-state) i think it would be much
>smaller.

Well, for now, two reasons:

1.    What I've got works for me, so "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"...

2.    I haven't had time to get up to speed on keep-state :-(

As I get time, I'll explore this...


>neat site.. in my bookmarks

Thanks, glad you find it useful!

--Dan

--
Dan O'Connor
On Matters of Most Grave Concern
    http://www.mostgraveconcern.com
FreeBSD Cheat Sheets
    http://www.mostgraveconcern.com/freebsd/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?008b01c0a062$38812200$029b140a>