From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 23:03:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6886B1065675; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Andriy Gapon Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:03:32 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <201007141414.o6EEEUx9014690@lurza.secnetix.de> <201008271833.42133.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4C784038.4070305@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4C784038.4070305@icyb.net.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008271903.34011.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 8.1-PRERELEASE: CPU packages not detected correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:03:44 -0000 On Friday 27 August 2010 06:46 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 28/08/2010 01:33 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > > Also, don't forget jhb's work based on ACPI affinity tables. > > Not sure how they are applicable here. Only SRAT is implemented ATM but SLIT should provide CPU affinity information without messing with CPUID. In fact, I'd prefer that over messing with Intel's CPUID hacks, which gets messier whenever they release a new core. ;-) Jung-uk Kim