From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 2 01:41:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB391065696 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 01:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (mail-ew0-f226.google.com [209.85.219.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33B68FC0C for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 01:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so5988315ewy.3 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:41:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LCED2dQb5ldYLK/7PVju/Xy6ZaJVNj+5Pc3K618Gl+4=; b=ZuGZa18CGuUeJdVBd23r2K3PqZfdKBT1UAf2D5CByIAXiHL4Kc/aRuLASzVVO8mnEC wklNvQJwqHFsRHfQdd+iOSnkilV8GbKfMis3XoIL/svO0C5EaPAHYckOJkmRshIFFY7U WcagUJ6feC8rI5kOHsar5ZMEri90lL66txI0M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nq3Tu7ymxXcvCw6W93LlnTnUXXYtifM5z5Gx2ux1uijSEm1ZwJbRZjuneFmrkKMbbO XPnBfhkqe4j7UABkJyPKs7iDFoNTp0/0H+7saBYfNuoB1CSIWvXitOuM9mSyHFivoY/T 55IAkgYuxdT4wYzHrvJP2AElkEhapoWbsqNDA= Received: by 10.216.93.69 with SMTP id k47mr2170571wef.179.1259718066911; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:41:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6sm1388287gve.16.2009.12.01.17.41.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:41:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 01:40:57 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091202014057.45256da4@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1572D7.60700@rawbw.com> References: <4B1572D7.60700@rawbw.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Why there are so many binary packages missing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:41:29 -0000 On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:47:35 -0800 Yuri wrote: > I am seeing this for a long time. If I use 'portupgrade > -aPP' (packages only) there is a very large percentage of packages > missing. Upgrading becomes many times faster when binary packages > available are available. Presumably it's due to version mismatches. If you are using release packages then portupgrade -aPP only works well with the ports tree snapshot on the install disk. If you are using STABLE packages then there's a lag between the port and the packages, the more frequently you update the less likely you are to get matching packages.