From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Dec 5 5:10:25 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 5 05:10:24 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk (bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.5.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4236437B400; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 05:09:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from sonic.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:08:51 +0000 From: Orion Hodson To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: cg@freebsd.org Subject: soundcard.h Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 13:08:50 +0000 Message-ID: <3737.976021730@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Sender: O.Hodson@cs.ucl.ac.uk Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As someone who works with sound quite a bit, its hard not to notice that soundcard.h covers several different and sometimes overlapping interfaces. I had a go at re-arranging it with an aim to clarifying what works, what's deprecated in newpcm, clarifying comments about "what does this do", and putting related items together. Cameron suggested it would be a better idea to break out the functionalities into separate include files, i.e. snd_oss.h, snd_pcm.h, snd_mixer.h, snd_sequencer.h, etc and have these included from soundcard.h. Is there any strength of feeling for or against doing this? It's completely aesthetic and very minor undertaking, but I don't mind doing if people think it'd be reasonable. - Orion To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message