From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 20:22:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 975) id 0F8101065670; Wed, 7 May 2008 20:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 20:22:18 +0000 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: Jeremy Messenger Message-ID: <20080507202217.GI70171@FreeBSD.org> References: <200805071306.m47D6CwN021711@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Alex Tutubalin , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/libraw Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 20:22:18 -0000 On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 02:20:51PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Wed, 07 May 2008 08:06:12 -0500, Sergey A. Osokin > wrote: > > >osa 2008-05-07 13:06:12 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > graphics/libraw Makefile > > Log: > > Add documentation and examples. > > Also, add compile optimization. [*] > > Bump PORTREVISION. > > There is no such of -O4 in GCC document. You should change it to make > sense, -O3. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.3/gcc/Optimize-Options.html I've talk about compile optimization with libraw author and he said he using gcc 3.x and 4.x and his optimization works like a charm. I'm also test -O4 on my FreeBSD 6.2-S box and under 8.0-C on amd64 (sledge). Jeremy, do you have any problem with compiling libraw? I'm also Cc'ed this letter to libraw author Alex Tutubalin. Alex, could you provide more information about compile optimization? Thank you. -- ozz