Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:33:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 224007] devel/p5-MooseX-Getopt: Escape cyclic dependencies Message-ID: <bug-224007-14331@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224007 Bug ID: 224007 Summary: devel/p5-MooseX-Getopt: Escape cyclic dependencies Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any URL: http://search.cpan.org/~ether/MooseX-Getopt-0.71/ OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: perl@FreeBSD.org Reporter: svysh.fbsd@gmail.com Flags: maintainer-feedback?(perl@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: perl@FreeBSD.org Created attachment 188439 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D188439&action= =3Dedit patch to update the port - fix BUILD_DEPENDS and TEST_DEPENDS to prevent cyclic dependencies (see be= low) - "portlint -AC" gives non-relevant warns. - testport of poudriere 3.2.99.20171127 at 11.1-release-amd64 with perl 5.2= 4.3 runs ok. - "make test" for this port (as run from within the same poudriere's jail) = say: "PASS". port (1)=20 devel/p5-MooseX-Getopt (author Karen Etheridge, maintainer perl@) depends from port devel/p5-MooseX-ConfigFromFile as BUILD_DEPENDS (but module MooseX::Getopt depends from module MooseX::ConfigFromFi= le only as a "test-prereq") http://search.cpan.org/~ether/MooseX-Getopt-0.71/ port (2)=20 devel/p5-MooseX-ConfigFromFile (author Karen Etheridge, maintainer kuriyama= @) depends from port devel/p5-MooseX-Types-Path-Tiny as BUILD_DEPENDS http://search.cpan.org/~ether/MooseX-ConfigFromFile-0.14/ port (3)=20 devel/p5-MooseX-Types-Path-Tiny (author Karen Etheridge, maintainer kuriyam= a@) does NOT depend from port devel/p5-MooseX-Getopt as BUILD_DEPENDS (but module MooseX::Types::Path::Tiny _explicitly_ depends from mod= ule MooseX::Getopt as a "prereq") http://search.cpan.org/~ether/MooseX-Types-Path-Tiny-0.012/ Very often all ports (1,2,3) are installed simultaneously as a common dependensies of other ports. This may be a reason why the found inconsisten= cy managed to stay hidden for so long. But port (3) if installed by itself is = not functional in present state, due to missing run_dependency from port (1).=20 Let "A -> B" mean that A depends from B as BUILD_DEPENDS Let "A ? B" mean that A does NOT depend from B as BUILD_DEPENDS At present we have build_dependencies of ports (1,2,3) as follows:=20 1 -> 2 -> 3 ? 1 We can not simply add a new build_dependency "devel/p5-MooseX-Getopt" to the port devel/p5-MooseX-Types-Path-Tiny. Because this way we get a cycle of dependencies as: 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 1 But we can arrange build_dependencies of ports (1,2,3) as follows:=20 1 ? 2 -> 3 -> 1 with all ports (1,2,3) fully functional this time. For this we have to simultaneously edit two ports: (1) devel/p5-MooseX-Getopt - move devel/p5-MooseX-ConfigFromFile from BUILD_DEPENDS to TEST_DEPENDS (see patch of this PR) (3) devel/p5-MooseX-Types-Path-Tiny - add devel/p5-MooseX-Getopt to BUILD_DEPENDS see PR No 224006: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224006 Maybe exp-run is needed after editing of BOTH ports (1,3), as=20 16 ports depend from devel/p5-MooseX-Getopt, 4 ports depend from devel/p5-MooseX-Types-Path-Tiny --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-224007-14331>