From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 9 08:00:05 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8149516A417; Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from galain.elvandar.org (redqueen.elvandar.org [217.148.169.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3845A13C48D; Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=galain.elvandar.org) by galain.elvandar.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IJ28u-000Ena-Nm; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:09:12 +0200 Received: from 194.74.82.3 (SquirrelMail authenticated user remko) by galain.elvandar.org with HTTP; Thu, 9 Aug 2007 09:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <57428.194.74.82.3.1186643352.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org> In-Reply-To: <200708090016.07548.david@vizion2000.net> References: <200708081620.l78GK69W018680@freefall.freebsd.org> <200708081502.14940.david@vizion2000.net> <20070808.161706.635731737.imp@bsdimp.com> <200708090016.07548.david@vizion2000.net> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 09:09:12 +0200 (CEST) From: "Remko Lodder" To: "David Southwell" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: usb@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, scottl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/114667: [umass] UMASS device error log problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: remko@elvandar.org List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 08:00:05 -0000 On Thu, August 9, 2007 9:16 am, David Southwell wrote: >> Warner > > That is precisely why I have put in a PR. CAM is pretty ancient and IMHO > it is > time it was revisited to get rid of this tiresome behaviour. Unfortunatley > I > do not have the capability to do it myself. In this case "hacking the > source" > iand "bug fixing" are synonyms. > > It needs fixing - and therefore a PR is IMHO most appropriate. > > David > With all due respect, I think this is -your- opinion, which you are entitled to ofcourse. Others might not be as convinced that this should be revised as you are. The PR database is for getting reports about problems, but as shown in this discussion, the PRoblem here is still under discussion. Especially since nobody replied to this, it gives me the feeling that this is just someone a few people want. I included Scott Long in the discussion who has more clue about CAM that I do ;-): Scott, what do you think about the proposal? ("CAM should be less verbose when you issue a camcontrol devlist for example"). thanks, remko -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder ** remko@elvandar.org FreeBSD ** remko@FreeBSD.org /* Quis custodiet ipsos custodes */