Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:23:40 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: aaron <aaron@meta.lo-res.org> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: openbios Message-ID: <20010828142339.A61193@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108282317240.51413-100000@meta.lo-res.org>; from aaron@meta.lo-res.org on Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:21:38PM %2B0200 References: <20010828161038.N81307@elvis.mu.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108282317240.51413-100000@meta.lo-res.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:21:38PM +0200, aaron wrote: > yes, but AFAIK they will replace standard BIOS calls with their own > abstraction layer/calls. Now if fbsd uses some "well known" BIOS calls > which differ in the openbios abstraction layer then it wont run. so the > question boils down to: is there some black magic bios call accessing code > in the kernel somewhere (which might break then)? I think the bottom line is that if you want FreeBSD to work optimally with this thing, the burden is on you to help make it so. Kris --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7jAvbWry0BWjoQKURAon7AKDN88YViV5SXSMPF66oW3tOuH0LJACgwABg 0P3pE3QqBPc7pB3FeeUVDH4= =2Nt1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010828142339.A61193>