From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 17:39:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7715616A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:39:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290AE43D4C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:39:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD5DA51218; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:39:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:39:44 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Thomas E. Zander" Message-ID: <20050405173944.GA86863@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050404211206.GP54656@marvin.riggiland.au> <20050404214644.GA61577@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050405074221.GR54656@marvin.riggiland.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050405074221.GR54656@marvin.riggiland.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic in 5.4 as of today X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:39:46 -0000 --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:42:21AM +0200, Thomas E. Zander wrote: > On Mon, 04. Apr 2005, at 14:46 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote > according to [Re: Panic in 5.4 as of today]: >=20 > > > #51 0xc0547e1b in sched_switch (td=3D0x1d, newtd=3D0x81ef50c, flags= =3DCannot access memory at address 0xbfbfed28 > > > ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:1300 > >=20 > > 1) Problems with FreeBSD-STABLE should go to the freebsd-stable@ > > mailing list >=20 > Yes, I know. Just thought that I should report to current because... >=20 > > 2) ULE is known to still have bugs. Jeff is now aware of them, so > > hopefully he'll be able to come up with a fix. >=20 > ...the crash is - as you pointed - ULE related which isn't completely > "stable" right now and sched_ule.c differs from stable to current by > only one commit. I'll see if I can reproduce this crash later with > the latest ULE from current. That also has known panics. See if you can reproduce it with 4BSD, to rule out the scheduler as a contributing factor. Kris --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCUs1gWry0BWjoQKURAqE7AJ9+icMOyLo/YpTn1iqe43EuLPYRUQCgktXD LVGKZPxxu1FuSnAWFETrmEA= =KnkE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--