From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 13 06:04:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20FA16A4CE for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 06:04:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54002.mail.yahoo.com (web54002.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4767C43D1F for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 06:04:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 58522 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Feb 2005 06:04:42 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=IPM3Vmas0q0UiVBwVU/b4esMCYK+vi1TTSWO6hE4Q05g/uEqtJ4GRqlJYPi0tL3k7dM1/z8JSlQKs4wOe6c3eso5EgWxdl2pVISw9yDRabA53qUYiJnQ8fTUHIrEkiTAYXvLYaJFT+9Ad8w/IqIgOt9svmjajNJE3GwEYMSbV/c= ; Message-ID: <20050213060442.58520.qmail@web54002.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.46.44.181] by web54002.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:04:42 PST Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:04:42 -0800 (PST) From: Rob To: markir@paradise.net.nz In-Reply-To: <420ECE69.9060006@paradise.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atapci VIA 82C596B UDMA66 controller: problem for 5.X ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 06:04:44 -0000 --- Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Rob wrote: > > > > What does that mean? UDMA66 and hw.ata.ata_dma=0 ? > > Hmmm, that is interesting, 2 suggestion to determine > what is going on: > - run diskinfo -t on your disks and let us know the > results > - use sysctl to set hw.ata.ata_dma=1 and see what > happens Thanks, I'll do that tonight and report here whether this helps or not. > > And why then is UDMA66 not automatically choosen > > at bootup? > > At a guess I would suggest that dma is broken for > your motherboards in 5.3 (what were they again?). Sorry, I don't understand your last question in the brackets. What does 'they' refer to? The motherboard(s), the type of dma, or what? Is it possible that the dma appears to be broken for 5.3 only, but works fine with 4.11 ? (I had no such problems with 4.11; then I did a fresh install of 5.3 and I got all these disk problems) > Oh and - you could try Soren's ATA mkIII patches, > even tho I suspect they may be intended for > 5.3-stable rather than 5.3-release (you got nothing > to lose at this point tho....) Maybe, maybe. But I first want to find out what's the actual problem. Later I may upgrade to stable. By then, this patch may have been applied to stable. Thanks, Rob. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com