From owner-cvs-all Sun Apr 14 9:26:20 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714BA37B405; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id C79E05309; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 18:26:14 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: John Baldwin Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/procfs procfs_status.c src/sys/compat/linprocfs linprocfs.c References: <200204132309.g3DN9fR11203@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 14 Apr 2002 18:26:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200204132309.g3DN9fR11203@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Baldwin writes: > Log: > - p_cansee() needs the target process locked. > - We need the proc lock held for more of procfs_doprocstatus(). Thanks. I've been vaguely worried about this for some time now. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message