Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      14 Apr 2002 18:26:14 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/procfs procfs_status.c src/sys/compat/linprocfs linprocfs.c
Message-ID:  <xzpit6ul00p.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <200204132309.g3DN9fR11203@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200204132309.g3DN9fR11203@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>   Log:
>   - p_cansee() needs the target process locked.
>   - We need the proc lock held for more of procfs_doprocstatus().

Thanks.  I've been vaguely worried about this for some time now.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpit6ul00p.fsf>