From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat May 5 9:10: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC8E37B42C for ; Sat, 5 May 2001 09:10:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f45GA4b55883; Sat, 5 May 2001 09:10:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 09:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200105051610.f45GA4b55883@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: kern/26309: PPPoE client panics in kernel - fxp Reply-To: Brett Glass Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/26309; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brett Glass To: drek@smashpow.net, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: drek@smashpow.net Subject: Re: kern/26309: PPPoE client panics in kernel - fxp Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 10:05:42 -0600 No, it seems to be a general problem. With some types of adapters, such as fxp, there is a kernel panic. With others, such as ed, PPPoE seems to work at first but fails to re-establish a connection after the link is temporarily broken. Brian Somers, maintainer of userland PPP, has asked me to try using the version of PPP that he has on his own Web site rather than the one in -STABLE. But I suspect that the problem is lower down -- in netgraph, the NIC drivers, or both. --Brett At 12:10 AM 5/5/2001, drek@smashpow.net wrote: >FYI: I am experiencing the same problem with 4.1-Release with the vr driver >I have not tried bringing the interface up first but will do so asap. I >thought it was just me until I found this PR tonight. > >cheers, > >Derek Marshall To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message