From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 28 13:56:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E835837B401 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD1543F93 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:56:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3SKtpm2067250; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:55:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3SKtpjg067249; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:55:51 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Mike Makonnen Message-ID: <20030428205551.GB67147@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20030426154030.M13476@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030427005543.GA96834@BSDWins.Com> <20030427060142.JOJH28930.out004.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030427060142.JOJH28930.out004.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: FreeBSD-rc@yahoogroups.com cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-rc] Re: RFC: Removal of the old rc system from -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-rc@yahoogroups.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:56:11 -0000 On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 02:01:41AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: > > I did notice something the other day, though, that I have a > > question about. What is the status of /etc/netstart? Are there > > plans to upgrade it to be aware of rcNG? ... > We should have functionality equivalent to it by 5.2. I don't think that it > should be a requirement to meet before removing rcOG, though. I have to strongly disagree. I use 'netstart' too often on my main development machines to be with out for any amount of time.