Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Nov 2004 04:05:04 -0500
From:      Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ronald Klop <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Performance issues in 5.3-RELEASE.
Message-ID:  <1100768703.5186.4.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <opshnjzetf8527sy@smtp.local>
References:  <20041117094022.GA8682@uci.agh.edu.pl> <opshnjzetf8527sy@smtp.local>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 03:46, Ronald Klop wrote:
> For what I have seen everybody uses snd_emu10k1. Since I use my onboard  
> soundcard (snd_ess* (not MPSAFE)) I have less problems with my sound under  
> disk load.

  None of the sound drivers are actually MPSAFE.. The reason people that
use snd_emu10k1 are more affected by this is because it has a smaller
default buffer size (4096) than the other drivers.

-- 
Suleiman Souhlal    | ssouhlal@vt.edu
The FreeBSD Project | ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1100768703.5186.4.camel>