From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 29 15:51:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA28798 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 15:51:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zet.internet.dk (zet.internet.dk [194.19.140.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA28748 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 15:51:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@internet.dk) Received: from pc.internet.dk (mail.swimsuit.internet.dk [194.255.12.232]) by zet.internet.dk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA15193 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 00:50:54 +0200 Message-Id: <199809292250.AAA15193@zet.internet.dk> Reply-To: <@image.dk> From: "Leif Neland" To: Subject: How to route when having two links to different places in the internet? Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 00:47:26 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We are going to have two links to the internet. One link is to carry national traffic to the other ISP's; one is to carry international traffic. How do I do this? Do I make a machine to act as a switch, with 3 ethernet cards: one to the local net, and one to each of the uplinks; this machine should then have a large static routetable? Or a machine with only one card, and the large static routetable; this machine is the default gateway for the rest? Or should I run routed? Or gated? And can either of these daemons construct the routing tables automatically? leifn@internet.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message