From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 31 06:57:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D3E106567F for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from smtp.mel.people.net.au (smtp.mel.people.net.au [218.214.17.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EFD98FC24 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: (qmail 11800 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 06:57:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) (218.215.191.244) by smtp.mel.people.net.au with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 06:57:07 -0000 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9310817066; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:57:18 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:57:18 +1000 From: andrew clarke To: Cezary Morga Message-ID: <20090731065718.GB56650@ozzmosis.com> References: <20090713023855.GA46001@ozzmosis.com> <4A5B8B9A.8040102@therek.net> <20090730062344.GA38645@ozzmosis.com> <4A7149F7.4040507@therek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A7149F7.4040507@therek.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: clsung@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: net/p5-Net-Twitter broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:57:23 -0000 On Thu 2009-07-30 09:21:27 UTC+0200, Cezary Morga (cm@therek.net) wrote: > >Warning: prerequisite MooseX::MultiInitArg 0 not found. > >Writing Makefile for Net::Twitter > > > >Is MooseX::MultiInitArg hidden somewhere in the ports tree? > > Nope. It's a missing dependency (also visible here > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-7-latest-logs/p5-Net-Twitter-3.03000.log). > > Please, fill in a PR for this. If you can prepare a proper patch for > the new port and modification to net/p5-Net-Twitter/Makefile that > would be even better. I'll attempt a PR, but I'm not at all competent enough in Perl to be confident in providing a patch. I have to wonder - why have these recent versions of this port been committed but not tested? If it was tested, presumably it would be flagged as "BROKEN". But isn't the rationale of the Ports tree to have buildable, working software?